Yosenjus... This is other deck that immediately intrigued me
as soon as the Secret Forces was released in the TCG. This is a solid anti-meta
strategy with OTK potential; really similar to Satellarknights and Fire Fists
(a deck which I always enjoyed playing). Recently, a Yosenju deck made it all
the way to Top 8 of ARG Metro Kentucky, which prompted me to write this
article.
A few days, I explained my Satellarknight anti-meta deck,
and how it was a reasonable (and budget) option to combat the current tier 1
decks. I also made it perfectly clear that your deck needs to be able to
consistently defeat the top decks of the format, if you want to see competitive
success. Well, Yosenjus are another option, and they are cheaper to build than
Satellarknights, and quite possibly the better deck between the two.
After some tinkering and a dedicated thought process, I've
come up with a build that I would like to experiment.
1 Thunder King
2 Fossil Dyna
3 Yosenju Tsujik - Mini-Honest of the archtype
3 Yosenju Kama 1 - Bounce 1 face-up card once per turn,
provided extra normal summon
2 Yosenju Kama 2 - Direct attack at half damage, provides
extra normal summon
3 Yosenju Kama 3 - Searches a Yosenju card when a Yosenju
monster does battle damage once per turn, provides extra normal summon
3 Tenki
2 MST
3 Duality
1 Snatch Steal
1 Book of Moon
1 Raigeki
1 Dimensional Fissure
3 Anti-Spell Fragrance
2 Dimensional Prison
2 Mirror Force
2 Fiendish Chain
3 Emptiness
1 Bottomless
1 Macro
The main point of the deck is to beat down the opponent with
Yosenju tactics, with traps to follow-up. Thunder King destroys Nekroz and
Qliphorts, and Fossil Dyna is strong against Nekroz and Burning Abyss.
I kept the monster line at 14 monsters. This is a deck that
can’t start off with too many monsters, or it will probably auto-lose. I would
rather draw 5 traps than 5 monsters, and hopefully I’ll be able to open with
multiple spells/traps every game, preferably with a floodgate in the mix.
I think the spell choices speak for themselves. In regards
to traps, there are more traps (maybe more than there should be) to protect
your monsters in battle. Sometimes, you will have to play "protect the
Dyna, or Thunder King", while building Yosenju cards, and all those battle
traps will assist with that. Anti-Spell Fragrance is a very great choice, since
it wrecks Nekroz and Qliphorts.
I didn't include an extra deck or side deck. A generic rank
4 toolbox should work fine. Side deck will be determined it necessary; AKA more
hate for the top decks.
This deck, in particular, does not auto-lose to Emptiness,
Vanity’s Fiend and the Djinn Releaser lock, which is beautiful. In fact, this
deck doesn’t even care if those cards are present. You’ll barely go into a rank
4 unless you have too, and that’s the only special summon the deck is capable
of.
There's a little part of me that prefers this deck over
Satellarknights, currently. This deck can afford to main deck Dimensional
Fissure and Macro, which is quite amazing. As well, it can afford to play Pot
of Duality, which is a lot better than Upstart Goblin in the decks that can
utilize it properly.
I don't immediately want to jump on the "Yosenju
Band-wagon". If I didn't already sleeve this deck before the hype became
real, I probably wouldn't even bother. I might as well experiment against
Nekroz, Burning Abyss and Qliphorts, and see how powerful this deck really is.
Going back to Satellarknights for a moment, I did do the
appropriate testing against the top decks. Against Nekroz and Qliphorts, the
deck won when Fragrance resolved, if not, the deck lost. Against Burning Abyss,
Diamond/Triverr control with Abyss Dweller was enough to get the job done, and
it's about 50/50. I'm bringing up these results because I want to see if
Yosenju can surpass these results.
I don’t think Yosenjus are tier 1, and I certainly don’t
think it’s the best deck of the format. However, I can’t deny this deck has a
lot of potential, and I might be proved wrong in regards to Yosenju being a
tier 1 option. Let me know what you think about the build, and any suggestions
you have. Thanks for reading!
No comments:
Post a Comment